[FUG-BR] Erro no Boot /dev/ada0p2 NO WRITE ACCESS

Nilton Jose Rizzo rizzo em i805.com.br
Quarta Fevereiro 15 22:29:56 BRST 2012


Em Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:25:56 -0200, Marcelo Gondim escreveu
> Em 15/02/2012 16:56, Enio Marconcini escreveu:
> > 2012/2/15 Enio Marconcini<eniorm at gmail.com>
> >
> >> salve galera.
> >> o servidor com freebsd 9.0Stable, estava rodando normalmente, em testes,
> >> hoje fui reiniciar ele, e durante o boot ficou parado com essa mensagem:
> >>
> >> Starting file system checks:
> >> /dev/ada0p2: NO WRITE ACCESS
> >> /dev/ada0p2: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY
> >> Automatic file system check failed; help!
> >> ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)!
> >> Feb 15 14:32:44 init /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to
> >> single user mod
> >> Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh:
> >>
> >> o dispositivo /dev/ada0p2 é o root filesys /
> >> pressionei enter e entrei com o /bin/sh mesmo, consegui montar as
> >> partições com mount -a (não retornou erro)
> >> se eu digitar exit ele sobe para o modo multiuser normalmente e inicia os
> >> serviços
> >>
> >> dei uma busca no google mas não consegui achar nada especificamente para
> >> este caso... alguém já passou por isso ou sabe o motivo aparente deste
> >> acontecimento?
> >>
> >> --
> >> *ENIO RODRIGO MARCONCINI*
> >> @eniomarconcini<http://twitter.com/eniomarconcini>
> >> *[ $[ $RANDOM % 6 ] == 0 ]&&  rm -rf / || echo "You live"**
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *
> >> *"H**ave a trouble with windows: reboot!*
> >> *Have a trouble with unix: be root!"*
> >>
> >>
> > mais um detalhe eu notei que isso acontece depois que eu ajustei o
> > securelevel=2 no /etc/sysctl.conf
> > dei boot com securelevel desativado e funcionou normalmente.
> >
> >
> Oi Enio,
> 
> Mas tipo toda vez que você inicia com securelevel=2 acontece isso ou 
> só aconteceu uma vez?
> -------------------------
> Histórico: http://www.fug.com.br/historico/html/freebsd/
> Sair da lista: https://www.fug.com.br/mailman/listinfo/freebsd

 Olhando no man:
 The kernel runs with five different security levels.  Any super-user
     process can raise the level, but no process can lower it.  The security
     levels are:

     -1    Permanently insecure mode - always run the system in insecure mode.
           This is the default initial value.
--More--(byte 21068)
     0     Insecure mode - immutable and append-only flags may be turned off.
           All devices may be read or written subject to their permissions.

     1     Secure mode - the system immutable and system append-only flags may
           not be turned off; disks for mounted file systems, /dev/mem and
           /dev/kmem may not be opened for writing; /dev/io (if your platform
           has it) may not be opened at all; kernel modules (see kld(4)) may
           not be loaded or unloaded.

     2     Highly secure mode - same as secure mode, plus disks may not be
           opened for writing (except by mount(2)) whether mounted or not.
           This level precludes tampering with file systems by unmounting
           them, but also inhibits running newfs(8) while the system is multi-
           user.

           In addition, kernel time changes are restricted to less than or
           equal to one second.  Attempts to change the time by more than this
           will log the message ``Time adjustment clamped to +1 second''.

     3     Network secure mode - same as highly secure mode, plus IP packet
           filter rules (see ipfw(8), ipfirewall(4) and pfctl(8)) cannot be
           changed and dummynet(4) or pf(4) configuration cannot be adjusted.

     The security level can be configured with variables documented in
     rc.conf(8).




-- 
Nilton José Rizzo 
805 Informatica 
Disseminando tecnologias 
021 2413 9786
---
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style



Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão freebsd